Writing It All Off after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Writing It All Off after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

By Mark E. Battersby / Published July 2018

Last December’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) allowed many within the pressure washing industry to expense and immediately write off more, including a 100-percent temporary expensing deduction for adding needed equipment, vehicles, or even a new shop building.

In addition to the increased write-offs available to help offset the cost of acquiring needed business assets, changing limits on Section 179 and first-year expensing further reduces out-of-pocket costs.

Writing off the cost of much of that newly acquired property in the year it is placed in service has long been possible under the Section 179, first-year expensing rules. The TCJA increased the maximum deduction for Section 179 property while also ramping up the other major write-off, so-called “bonus” depreciation, raising it from 50 percent to 100 percent for property placed in service before 2023.

First Year Write-Offs

Section 179 is an incentive designed by lawmakers to encourage businesses to buy equipment and invest in their operations. In essence, Section 179 allows a pressure cleaning contractor, equipment dealer, or supplier to deduct the full purchase price of qualifying equipment and/or software purchased during the tax year. In other words, if qualifying equipment is purchased, the full cost can be deducted as an immediate expense.

Under our tax rules—and the new law—a pressure cleaning business can choose to treat the cost of any Section 179 property as an expense and deduct it in the year the property is placed in service. The new law increased the maximum amount that can be deducted from $500,000 to $1,000,000. The phase-out threshold, after which the Section 179 deduction is reduced dollar-for-dollar, was also increased from $2 million to $2.5 million.

The TCJA expanded the definition of Section 179 property to include improvements made to nonresidential real property after it is placed in service—in other words, improvements to a building’s interior. Of course, they don’t qualify if they are due to these causes: 

  • The enlargement of the building,
  • Any elevator or escalator, or
  • The internal structural framework of the building.

Viva La Differences

Unfortunately, the new law keeps the general 39-year recovery period for nonresidential real property such as a shop, office, or warehouse. Qualified leasehold improvement property, restaurant property, and retail improvement property are no longer separately defined or given a special 15-year recovery period under the new law.

The most important difference between the Section 179 first-year expensing allowance and bonus depreciation has long been that both new and used equipment qualified for the Section 179 deduction. Today, however, used equipment can qualify for bonus depreciation.

The Section 179 deduction is usually taken first, followed by the bonus depreciation. Generally, bonus depreciation is useful to very large businesses spending more than the Section 179 spending cap (currently $2.5 million) on new capital equipment. Of course, businesses with a net loss are still allowed to deduct some of the cost of new equipment and carry the loss forward.

That “Bonus” Write-Off

For all property acquired by the pressure cleaning business and placed in service after September 27, 2017, the TCJA requires a full 100 percent deduction of the cost of eligible new and used property unless the operation chooses not to claim the depreciation write-off for any class of property.

While the new law eliminates the requirement that the original use of the qualified property begin with the water jetting operation or business, so long as it had not previously used the acquired property and the property was not acquired from a related person or entity, it qualifies. However, the 100 percent deduction phases out at a rate of 20 percent per year beginning with the 2023 tax year (and extended by one-year for certain long-production-period property and aircraft).

Paybacks are Expensive

Although Section 179 is a write-off rather than a depreciation deduction, many in the pressure cleaning industry feel that no records must be kept. The write-off is, however, comparable to claiming all of the depreciation allowed in one year. Should the business asset or property be sold or otherwise disposed of, a portion or all of that write-off may have to be recaptured or paid back. Obviously, the best approach is to treat all qualifying purchases like fixed asset acquisitions, retaining all documentation for at least four years after the property or assets are disposed of.

And, above all, don’t forget about the property or assets being replaced. The sale of business equipment or property can generate a short-term loss. A sale that produces a gain generates ordinary income up to the recapture of depreciation after which it produces a capital gain—if held long enough.

What happens when equipment, vehicles, fixtures, or other business assets or property that are no longer useful to the pressure cleaning operation are replaced with Section 179 or bonus depreciation acquisitions? Fortunately, many businesses can claim an “abandonment” loss.

Of course, in order for the IRS to accept a bona fide abandonment write-off of any business asset, there must be an actual intent to abandon it. There must also be an “overt” act to abandon the asset. Not too surprisingly, this two-pronged test can frequently be difficult to document.

Special Rules For Cars and Personal Use Property

Several years ago, Section 179 became known as the “SUV Tax Loophole” because so many businesses were writing off the purchase of what were then qualifying vehicles. While that particular benefit of Section 179 has been severely reduced, special rules—and limits—remain on deductions for cars and personal use property.

New limits on the write-off for the cost of so-called luxury automobiles and personal use property were included in the TCJA. For passenger automobiles and light trucks placed in service after December 31, 2017, where the additional first-year depreciation deduction is not claimed, the maximum amount of allowable depreciation is increased to $10,000 for the year in which the vehicle is placed in service, $16,000 for the second year, $9,600 for the third year, and $5,760 for the fourth and later years in the recovery period.

For passenger automobiles placed in service after 2018, these dollar limits are indexed for inflation. And for those eligible for bonus first-year depreciation, the TCJA retained the $8,000 limit for additional first-year depreciation for passenger automobiles. Thus, in 2018 the maximum first-year write-off is $18,000.

Similar rules apply to not only passenger automobiles but also any property used as a means of transportation, as well as to property used for purposes of entertainment, recreation, or amusement. Computers and peripheral equipment have been removed from the definition of listed property and are no longer subject to the increased substantiation requirements.

When it comes to leased vehicles used in the pressure cleaning business, a deduction is permitted for the part of the lease payment that represents its business use. If it is used 100 percent of the time for business, the full lease cost is deductible.

So that vehicle leases don’t escape the luxury vehicle limits, a portion of the lease payment must be included in income during each year to partially offset the lease deduction. That amount varies with the initial fair market value of the leased vehicle and the year of the lease. The amount is also adjusted for inflation each year.

Let The Write-Offs Roll

Lawmakers are pretty strict when it comes to allowing deductions. The cost of starting a business, for example, can’t be deducted because there is no business. Just as there can be no business until the operation “opens its doors” for the first time, buying new equipment or other business assets doesn’t mean that the cost can be immediately deducted or written-off; they must first be “placed in service.”

Determining the date property is placed in service for depreciation or other write-off purposes requires looking at factors such as the property’s assigned function and when the property is in a condition or state of readiness and available for specifically assigned functions.

Caveat: Expensing Is Not Always The Best Option

Buying may not always be the best option even with the new 100-percent write-off. Expensing drops the book value or basis of the business asset to zero. If the asset is sold, any amount up to the purchase price will be ordinary, fully taxable income.

Spreading the expense through depreciation deductions will reduce taxable income down the road when the pressure cleaning business may be more profitable and have higher tax bills. Another time expensing may not be the most economic route is when the asset might be sold in the near future and/or the asset is one that holds its value.

The changes in the cost recovery rules are already having a significant impact on whether newly acquired equipment or business property should be depreciated or expensed and whether or not to choose bonus depreciation for any class of property. Because the new rules interact with other provisions of the law, every pressure cleaning business owner should seek professional advice and assistance in planning to maximize their write-offs for business property and assets.

Current Digital Issue

Click to read.

Past Digital Issues

Click to read.


March 2024
February 2024
January 2024