CETA Edge: Benchmarking

 

 

CETA Edge

Benchmarking

By Diane M. Calabrese / Published March 2023

Photo by iStockphoto.com/robuart

How are we doing? Could we do better? Successful businesses ask themselves such questions. They get answers through multiple channels.

     Businesses take stock of unsolicited customer feedback. They directly query customers, too. All ways of assessing performance, and making course corrections, are good.

     Yet there’s one method many businesses could use to retrieve even more information. That’s benchmarking, which allows a business to gauge its fitness against competitors. 

     Yes, competitors, and it’s all safe and anonymous. Data supplied by individual companies is held in strict confidence. Companies remain anonymous to one another.

     The Cleaning Equipment Trade Association (CETA) offers a benchmarking program to its distributor members. The program is a benefit of membership.

     Three manufacturer members of CETA sponsor the benchmarking program, which is administered by Profit Planning Group, Inc., in Denver, CO. Sponsorship attests to the value the manufacturers attach to the program.

     “Mi-T-M’s decision to sponsor the benchmarking program is important to us,” says Karl Loeffelholz, distributor division manager at the employee-owned company, a corporation based in Peosta, IA. “It allows dealers to see for themselves how to become more proficient in day-to-day operations.”

     Both the distributor and the manufacturer sponsor gain. “It frees up participants’ capital expenses, making it extremely attractive to participate in this no-cost benefit,” says Loeffelholz. “It keeps our company’s brand name in front of a host of professional dealers that are always looking to improve their business, and we want to be part of it.”

     Alkota Cleaning Systems, Inc., in Alcester, SD, is another sponsor of the CETA benchmarking program. Scott Hansen, president of the company, is the current president of CETA.

     “Benchmarking is a great tool to evaluate your business,” says Hansen. “The time invested will be well worth the data you receive and the ability to compare your business to your peers.”

     Enthusiasm for what the benchmarking program can do to help build the strength of businesses is definitely one of the things that motivates sponsors. The sponsors want to see the distributors, the manufacturers that supply them with equipment, and the entire industry thrive.

     “Kärcher [North America] is pleased to help sponsor the CETA benchmarking program,” says Rob Smith, the Hotsy director of sales at the company headquartered in Aurora, CO. “We believe that the dealers who represent our company’s brands and participate gain valuable insight as to not only how well they are doing in their own business by measuring specific metrics, but also how they are doing compared to their peers.”

     Smith reminds us why the metrics are so important to distributors. “It helps them find gaps and capitalize on opportunities,” he explains.

     Capitalizing on opportunities is the precise outcome that sponsors of the benchmarking program would like to see. Moreover, it aligns with the overarching perspective of the company, the aforementioned Profit Planning Group, that conducts the program for CETA. 

     The Centennial State-based, team-oriented company eschews comments from individual team members. But its objective is to “inspire” the businesses with which it works, explains a team member. The report each benchmarking participant receives is structured to easily demonstrate that small changes in the right areas can lead to big improvements.

     Each participant in the benchmarking program receives a Performance Analysis Report (PAR), a guide for improvement. With the guide in hand, a participant can ask exacting questions under the “how are we doing” umbrella.

     Customers may be as content as they can be. But is the company doing enough to control expenses? Does an investment in sales bring a corresponding increase in net profit? In other words, is the company making money, growing, healthy?

     In the context of health of a company, the PAR also can be a valuable tool when approaching potential creditors or lenders. Being able to present quantitative data that verify the fitness of a company brings positive attention.

Getting Inspired

     The current chairman of the CETA benchmarking committee is R. Calvin Rasmussen, the president and CEO of Royce Industries L.C. in West Jordan, UT. An enthusiastic proponent of benchmarking, he and the committee are formulating goals for 2023 that include encouraging more participation.

     Rasmussen says that “an explosion of growth” is possible for members who make use of the benchmarking tool. He emphasizes that membership in CETA includes participation in the benchmarking program if the member wishes to take part. 

     The results provided to each participant in the PAR become even more valuable when they become cumulative, explains Rasmussen. “The longer you participate, the better the reports you get.” 

     Year-on-year results go beyond helping a participant assess rank among peers. “It quantifies how you are growing or declining from year to year,” explains Rasmussen. “This further helps your company pivot and adjust.”

     Rasmussen compares his anticipation of receipt of the PAR as much like the excitement of waking up on Christmas morning. “I cannot wait to see what the report has in store for our company.”

     During his chairmanship, Rasmussen wants to persuade members of CETA who do not yet benchmark to do so. He explains that the PAR is much more than a compilation of “numbers, percentages, ratios” and so on. “It also educates the recipient on how to understand these data points.”

     While members of CETA may be competing with one another in one sense, they are also collaborating (informally) as they become stronger and, in turn, build a stronger industry. “As individual members of CETA grow, our industry grows,” says Rasmussen.

     This marks year 15 of the benchmarking program at CETA, which began in 2008. It has been in the hands of the same outside vendor for the entire time, the sort of continuity that speaks to the reliability of the company and the value of the results provided to members.

     Rasmussen’s business has been a participant in the benchmarking program since its inception. And results have become an invaluable tool in planning.

     “We use benchmarking and its subsequent PAR as part of our annual budgeting, planning, and strategy,” says Rasmussen. And he refers to “golden nuggets” discovered.

     Some examples? “Sales per” is one. That is per employee, customer, vehicle. Teasing out information in this way makes it easier to know where adjustments must be made. 

     Time (and correspondingly money) invested in a customer that results in the sale of a pressure washer is good. Time invested in a bigger outcome, time which results in the sale of the pressure washer, detergents, automatic parts washers, accessories, parts, and preventive maintenance, is better. And the metrics in the PAR will document that.

     Another example? The admonition to review insurance coverage each year implies to many that they should make certain it’s sufficient. In some cases, though, businesses pay too much for casualty and liability insurance. The analysis allows them to ferret that out and fix it.

     And then there’s the prescriptive action plan, a summary of the top five areas that would benefit from focus. It’s just one more tool a company can use to tailor improvements.

     Rasmussen says there is no way to overstate his enthusiasm for the CETA benchmarking program, which he ties to year-over-year growth at his company. It’s an enthusiasm he aims to share with CETA members who are not currently among those participating.


Current Digital Issue

Click to read.

Archives

April 2026
March 2026
February 2026
January 2026

  1. More Archives >>

    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021

    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013