Benchmarking


Current Digital Issue

Click to read.

Archives

April 2026
March 2026
February 2026
January 2026

  1. More Archives >>

    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021

    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013

Benchmarking: Deadline for CETA’s 2015 Profit Planning Survey Is June 30, 2015

By Diane M. Calabrese / Published June 2015

top-pic

 

From the Marine Corps Marathon to the Indianapolis 500, there’s nothing like meeting with competitors to assess performance and develop strategy for improvement. Ever since the Cleaning Equipment Trade Association (CETA) introduced the Planning for Profit benchmarking program in 2008, manufacturers and distributors have had their own opportunity to compare with and readjust to competitors.

  The Planning for Profit program allows manufacturers and distributors to analyze cumulative, year-over-year data on performance—both in-house and in the context of data collected from other companies. Information submitted by manufacturers and distributors is treated confidentially by the Profit Planning Group, Boulder, CO, which administers the survey for CETA. Identities of survey participants cannot be inferred from aggregate results.

CETA members and distributors for Alkota Cleaning Systems, Inc. and Mi-T-M Corporation, manufacturers that in part sponsor the survey, are eligible to participate in Planning for Profit benchmarking program at no cost.

Each participant in Profit for Planning will receive a Performance Analysis Report (PAR). The PAR enables the participant to ask and answer tough questions, such as: Can more be done to control expenses? How much more can we control expenses without jeopardizing sales opportunities? The PAR also proves a useful tool when meeting with lenders or others providing credit to a business. 

For manufacturers and distributors that want a quantitative and objective assessment of their performance, the PAR is a superb tool. Moreover, in 2015, CETA will be offering a series of webinars about how to make full use of the PAR.

The robustness and predictive value of each PAR grows with the number of participants in the Profit Planning survey. There is a great deal that can be learned by looking at performance in the context of the competition. It’s why runners—and even gardeners—compete by comparing results.

Reallocating resources and refining business plans both benefit from a timely, contextual, and unbiased assessment of how a company is fairing—the sort of assessment the PAR from Profit for Planning provides.

The deadline for submission of information is June 30, 2015 (reporting for 2014). Download the 2015 Profit Planning Survey in PDF format from the CETA website (www.ceta.org).

Why Do Manufacturers Support the Survey?

“Benchmarking is a great way to compare the results of operations of a distributor’s business to the results of operations of similar-sized distributor businesses in the pressure washer industry,” explains Gary Scott, president of Alkota Cleaning Systems in Alcester, S.D.

“Benchmarking is also a great way to compare how my company’s income statement and balance sheet ratios have changed from year to year as we continue the benchmarking process over a number of years,” explains Scott. It is part of the continual improvement process. It is a great management tool. I wish we could get all distributors to join CETA as well as the benchmarking program to improve everyone’s operations. That is why our company has supported the program over the years with dollars to keep the program funded.”

There’s a parallel perspective from Aaron Auger, the water treatment division manager at Mi-T-M Corporation in Peosta, IA. “Our company is pleased to once again help to sponsor the CETA benchmarking program in 2015,” he says. “In the years where CETA has had manufacturers support in helping to fund the program, participation has increased significantly. We as a manufacturer feel that this support is crucial in securing the participation of our members to give an accurate assessment of the data that is being collected.”

Positive reports from CETA members reinforce the significance of the program. “Members that we have had the opportunity to speak to about the benchmarking program have all had positive results. Almost everyone has been able to extract at least one piece from their custom, confidential report that will help their business bottom line. It’s by talking with my dealers that I understand the importance of the program to our dealer base. I was on the CETA board of directors when benchmarking was first introduced to our membership, and I truly believe in the strengths the program has to offer. I would encourage all dealers in our industry to consider taking the time to participate in CETA’s benchmarking program.”