Chemical Safety

 

 

Chemical Safety

by Diane M. Calabrese | Published June 2025

Chemical Safety stock image

 

The good, the bad and the ugly – a catchy phrase. More’s the pity that it does not apply to chemicals.

Or anything else.

Chemicals must be evaluated in context. Elemental sodium is incendiary. Sodium united with chlorine as salt takes on an innocuous – and endlessly useful — form.

But surely there are chemicals – everything is ultimately a chemical – in elemental or compound form that are only good. Perhaps not. If the chemical is in the wrong place at the wrong time, such as a supply of oxygen enhancing a fire. And then there’s water intoxication among those who imbibe too much.

Chemical safety begins and ends where all safe practices do: Paying attention to details while immersed in an activity.

Our industry does not use as many chemicals as many others. But transport, storage, labeling, and correct use all come into play. Safe use of chemicals, then, is about more than a dilution or a compound choice.

It is about not overlooking anything. For instance, consider disposal.

“Disposal is one of the most overlooked” dimensions to safe chemical use, says Linda Chambers, brand and sales manager at GCE/Soap Warehouse Brand in Norcross, GA. “Most chemicals should not just be tossed in the garbage or poured down a drain, even a sewer drain.”

So where do we look to find the guide for proper disposal? That’s tricky.

“Unfortunately, SDSs [safety data sheet] are not that helpful [as] most just list in Section 13, ‘Dispose in accordance with all applicable regulations. May be subject to disposal regulations: U.S. EPA 40 CFR 261. Hazardous Waste Number(s): D002,’ which is not very helpful,” explains Chambers.

But the how-to of disposal is not the only puzzle. “Another issue is cost,” says Chambers.

“To properly dispose of chemicals, companies usually have to pay a specialized service company to come and pick up for disposal, which can be expensive if only small amounts are occasionally needed and not a monthly service,” explains Chambers. That’s just one part of the cost.

“[There] are usually volume minimums that must be met to get a pickup,” says Chambers. Fully understanding the difficulties in disposal, she has ventured to help contractors.

“I have suggested and looked into having a company do a monthly pickup as a vendor at our location for our contractor customers – like battery stores or auto-supply stores do for their customers,” explains Chambers. “We have spoken to our contractor customers, but they were not interested in paying even a small fee per gallon for us to even try to service.”

Chambers laments that the strategy she suggested had no takers. “I wish I knew some way to motivate service contractors to do the right thing when disposing of expired, unwanted or contaminated chemicals when the situation arises.”

Of course, Chambers hopes – as we all do, that contractors are doing the right thing and using an appropriate disposal system. There are many training programs in the safe use of chemicals available. Thus, the guidance is there for the taking.

Which training programs would Chambers recommend? “The PWNA has online training classes at PWNA.org – Chemical Safety $49. [Our company] does a few classes during the year, the ABC’s of Chemicals and Chemical Safety and Spill Kits; these are free with $25 deposit you get back on the day of class to use to buy product in our store. The Power Wash Academy also has an online Chemical Safety Class, $49.”

We cite the prices (always subject to change) only to emphasize the modest investment needed to obtain expert assistance with the ins and outs of chemical safety. Moreover, the instructional offerings Chambers cites are just a sampling of educational choices available.

 

Leading the way

In one sense, our industry leads the way in chemical safety. Extracting the most cleaning work from water – pressurized, heated or steamed – reduces the need for chemicals. That means fewer chemicals with which to deal.

OSHA envisions the elimination and reduction of chemicals in the workplace – particularly outrightly hazardous chemicals, as a boon to worker wellbeing. And it offers a toolkit on the subject (see https://www.osha.gov/safer-chemicals).

The OSHA toolkit emphasizes a thoughtful approach. For example, a company should frequently review its chemical use. How can more be done with less or a switch to a less troublesome chemical be made?

There is no question that exposure to certain chemicals causes health problems, which may result in fatalities. According to OSHA, illnesses tied to exposure to chemicals on the job approach 200,000 each year. And then, there are the deaths: 50,000 annually.

While OSHA aims to partner with employers to minimize exposure to chemicals, NIOSH [National Institute for Safety and Health] aims to make it as simple as possible to understand the nature and the risks of specific chemicals. As such, it now has available (open access) one of the finest retrieval tools for information about chemicals we have ever seen. (See https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/chemicals/about/index.html to get started.)

In addition to its own NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards (in website, pdf, mobile formats), NIOSH links to the International Chemical Safety Card (ICSC) database.

The ICSC database can be queried by the name of a chemical, the CAS [Chemical Abstracts Service] number for a chemical, the UN number for a chemical, or the ICSC number. A query can also be entered with a text string.

(See https://chemicalsafety.ilo.org/dyn/icsc/showcard.listCards3?p_lang=en. This writer chose English among the many languages offered for ICSC database users.)

The test query we entered was ‘sodium hypochlorite’ (by name). In return, we were offered two choices of cards – one for less than a 10 percent solution of sodium hypochlorite and one for a more than 10 percent solution. Storage (separated from acids, cool and dark place, original container), safety precautions (protective eyewear, no eating or drinking when using) and first aid are among the inclusive and lucidly tabulated returns on the card.

 

Clarity

OSHA is not the only regulator interested in chemical safety. In addition to NIOSH at CDC, there is EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]. For all the information regulators provide, there is a great deal left to discretion of the chemical’s user – take the example again of “proper disposal”.

Where to begin? Don’t do anything stupid, such as using an unlabeled container or an unsuitable container to store a chemical. Many a chemical should only be stored in its original container. We assume that members of our industry never fall into the just-this-once trap of ignoring a protocol for storage or labeling.

Beyond meticulous attention in transport, storage (including shelving) and disposal, a business owner must ensure risks posed to employees from workplace chemicals are communicated. That is the essence of OSHA’s workplace hazard communication standard (HCS). Hazard designation is based on assessment of permissible exposure limits (PELs). Note that in California, many PELs are lower than national numbers and they supersede their federal counterparts.

In addition to PELs, there are RELs – “r” for recommended, which NIOSH develops. They are almost always lower than PELs. (In the exposure limit lexicon, there are still other entries, which take into account things such as short-term and time-weighted exposure).

Although a one-time use of a chemical may not require a respirator, the cumulative effect of many short uses may dictate the use of respirator. Chemical safety requires a realistic approach, one in which the risks are known and mitigated.

Know the chemical – shelf life, risks (in use, storage, transport and disposal), and always choose the least harsh chemical for the job. And keep up to date on options (and expectations).


Current Digital Issue

Click to read.

Archives

April 2026
March 2026
February 2026
January 2026

  1. More Archives >>

    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021

    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013